|
Wombat
|
 |
« on: June 09, 2006, 05:57:45 AM » |
|
Ministers were told that civil wedding would not be legal ~ TimesA document released under the Freedom of Information Act shows that John Major’s Government insisted a decade ago that the Royal Family would be forbidden from marrying in register offices Hmmm...the plots thickens  Royal wedding ~ TimesMarriages are made in Heaven, not statute books: Honi soit qui mal y pense The marriage of the Prince of Wales and the Duchess of Cornwall is illegal — according to the official advice of 1996. Secret document warned Charles remarriage would be illegal ~ Daily MailIt also said the Anglican church would have a 'moral obligation' to refuse to bring together two divorcees. Charles Mosley, editor-in-chief of Debrett's and an expert on formal marriages and society events, said: 'This could be the trigger that brings about the passing of the throne to William. We have to know whether our King is legally married or not.'
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: June 09, 2006, 12:04:18 PM by wombat »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
heather
heather
Aristocrat
 Offline
Posts: 6,164
I don't suffer fools gladly
|
|
« Reply #1 on: June 09, 2006, 08:56:40 AM » |
|
Their marriage is illegal, they should see about rectifying this situation ..ASAP!
The ramifications of this could be very damaging to the monarchy, enough damage has been done already by them.
Heather
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Elizabeth
Palace Visitor
Offline
Posts: 199
|
|
« Reply #2 on: June 09, 2006, 06:50:12 PM » |
|
Heather, I absolutely agree with you.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
'This may not be the best times but it is the time we do live in' (Schopenhauer)
'let freedom ring' (M.L. King)
|
|
|
|
Wombat
|
|
« Reply #3 on: June 09, 2006, 10:49:36 PM » |
|
I think it was something that Charles didn't consider for long enough. He should have announced his engagement and then waited for perhaps at least 6 months for all of the legalities of it to be debated and then sorted out. This would have given everyone peace of mind. I'd be interested to know what Riley thinks of this... *goes off to pm her*  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Windsor
|
|
« Reply #4 on: June 09, 2006, 11:21:28 PM » |
|
Their marriage is illegal, they should see about rectifying this situation ..ASAP!
The ramifications of this could be very damaging to the monarchy, enough damage has been done already by them.
Heather
How has the Monarchy been damaged by the wedding of Their Royal Highnesses the Duke and Duchess of Cornwall. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Wombat
|
|
« Reply #5 on: June 10, 2006, 12:27:35 AM » |
|
If there is any question of the validity of it that may in the future cast a doubt over his sucession then it has done damage to the monarchy  Charles and Camilla marriage: your views ~ TimesThe marriage of the Prince of Wales to Camilla Parker Bowles was illegal, according to government advice given at the time of his divorce from Diana, Princess of Wales. A document released under the Freedom of Information Act shows that John Major's Government insisted a decade ago that the Royal Family would be forbidden from marrying in register offices. Is Charles and Camilla's marriage invalid? How does this affect Prince Charles's position as heir to the throne? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Stix Chix
^_^
Administrator
Forum Royal
Offline
Posts: 13,119
stix wit me!
|
|
« Reply #6 on: June 10, 2006, 01:17:25 AM » |
|
How has the Monarchy been damaged by the wedding of Their Royal Highnesses the Duke and Duchess of Cornwall.
i guess its all bcuz he's the future King and will be governer of the church. if he's broken Church law...and there have been people saying that since before he was married the 2nd time....it does make Charles look pretty bad. even if he was just given the wrong advice it still looks as though he was a part of it considering how quickly he and Camilla married. they got hitched so fast you'd have thought there was a bun in the oven had they been a lot younger!  at least its not as bad as the prince who married his Catholic mistress in secret.  but its still pretty boneheaded. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
  Harryite #0004 |
|
|
|
Wombat
|
|
« Reply #7 on: June 10, 2006, 05:51:26 AM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tiara
Palace Visitor
Offline
Posts: 580
|
|
« Reply #8 on: June 10, 2006, 03:21:45 PM » |
|
i guess its all bcuz he's the future King and will be governer of the church. if he's broken Church law...and there have been people saying that since before he was married the 2nd time....it does make Charles look pretty bad. even if he was just given the wrong advice it still looks as though he was a part of it considering how quickly he and Camilla married. they got hitched so fast you'd have thought there was a bun in the oven had they been a lot younger! at least its not as bad as the prince who married his Catholic mistress in secret. but its still pretty boneheaded. Good one :flowers: I totally agree  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Princess Diana was a human being, with all the faults of most of us, but also with a bigger heart than most of us. As I discovered on that last mission for humanity, there was an underlying humility which, at least to me, redeems all. - Nelson Mandela
|
|
|
Lila the Flirt
Harryite #0027
Global Moderator
Forum Royal
Offline
Posts: 27,700
Good King Henry
|
|
« Reply #9 on: June 11, 2006, 05:26:40 AM » |
|
Interesting.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 I hate dating. You need to be holding a sign that says "I'm the one" so I can know who you are!!!! |
|
|
juliathegreat
Palace Visitor
Offline
Posts: 161
|
|
« Reply #10 on: June 12, 2006, 10:41:51 AM » |
|
NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW.... including kings and queens of the nations !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
julia
|
|
|
juliathegreat
Palace Visitor
Offline
Posts: 161
|
|
« Reply #11 on: June 12, 2006, 10:52:46 AM » |
|
SERVES THEM RIGHT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
julia
|
|
|
brandaleia
Palace Visitor
Offline
Posts: 390
|
|
« Reply #12 on: June 12, 2006, 01:54:01 PM » |
|
the person that interpreted the law before they got married should have said something
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 Cheeseite #010, Willite #062, Chelsyite #019, Dianaite #003, ElizabethII-ite #005, Phillipite #002, Peterite #007 |
|
|
newtheme
Palace Visitor
Offline
Posts: 286
|
|
« Reply #13 on: June 12, 2006, 09:27:36 PM » |
|
Charles has to fight hard for what he really wants. So Keep fighting Charles!
If the illegal one is annuled in the summer, sunshine will move into England in August.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Wombat
|
|
« Reply #14 on: June 13, 2006, 05:39:54 AM » |
|
the person that interpreted the law before they got married should have said something
They were informed. They choose to ignore the previous information and advice given and take another approach under the Human Rights Act as opposed to the Marriage Act. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
heather
heather
Aristocrat
Offline
Posts: 6,164
I don't suffer fools gladly
|
|
« Reply #15 on: June 13, 2006, 05:14:23 PM » |
|
They charged ahead in a very unseemly manner with this wedding because questions were being asked re: finances, Camilla, and the Duchy of Cornwall.
Charles would not listen to those advisors who asked him to be cautious, as per usual.
Heather
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Wombat
|
|
« Reply #16 on: June 14, 2006, 12:21:00 AM » |
|
I've always thought that it was more to do with the questions of his finances than a real desire to marry Camilla. It was clear to see....in fact I think someone here said that there would be a release of pics or a big story about the boys to conteract the negative issues surrounding his finances...boy were they wrong. Goes to show the shallowness of some. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Dilber MC Theme by HarzeM